10 ENGLISH BOOKS RELATING TO «DENYING THE ANTECEDENT»
Discover the use of
denying the antecedent in the following bibliographical selection. Books relating to
denying the antecedent and brief extracts from same to provide context of its use in English literature.
1
An Introduction to Logic
Thus the pattern AC (affirming the consequent) and the pattern DA (denying the
antecedent) are both neutrovalid. The fact that they are not panvalid leads to the
first fallacy of affirming the consequent (thinking that a given argument is valid ...
Morris Raphael Cohen, Morris R. Cohen, Ernest Nagel, 1993
When using conditional propositions, we cannot reach a deductively valid
conclusion based either on denying the antecedent condition or on affirming the
consequent. Let's return to the proposition, “If you are a husband, then you are
married.
3
Logics: Affirming
the Consequent, Argument Form,
Denying the ...
Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online.
Books Group, Books Llc, 2010
Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. In philosophy, a formal fallacy or a logical fallacy is a pattern of reasoning which is always wrong.
Lambert M. Surhone, Miriam T. Timpledon, Susan F. Marseken, 2010
5
Attacking Faulty Reasoning
... a well-formed deductive argument, the conclusion follows necessarily from the
premises. I: Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent -[DEFlNlT|ON Denying the
antecedent of a conditional premise and then concluding the denial of the
consequent.
6
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to ...
DENYING THE ANTECEDENT DEFINITION Denying the antecedent of a
conditional statement and then inferring the denial of the consequent. In a
conditional or “if, then” statement, the part of the sentence that comes after the “if”
is called the ...
7
Critical Thinking:
The Art of Argument
Using S1 and S2 as above, this argument has the form of denying the antecedent
: (1) If S1, then S2. (2) Not S1. Therefore, (3) Not S2. This form is invalid (=
improper). Arguments with this form have one premise that's a conditional and
another ...
George Rainbolt, Sandra Dwyer, 2014
8
Natural Deduction: An Introduction To Logic With Real ...
4.2.2 DENYING THE ANTECEDENT Symmetry demands a fallacious form of
argument standing in the same relation to modus tollens as the fallacy of
affirming the consequent does to modusponens. I wouldn't dream of
disappointing ...
Richard T.W. Arthur, 2011
9
Handbook of
the Logic of Argument and Inference:
The Turn ...
If not, it probably won't. Supporting the contextual interpretation of a conditional
as a biconditional, a number of studies show a specific influence of content on
the frequency of denying the antecedent and affirming the consequent. In
particular ...
R.H. Johnson, H.J. Ohlbach, Dov M. Gabbay, 2002
10
A Workbook for Arguments: A Complete Course in Critical ...
Exercise Set 10.5: Two deductive fallacies Objective: To practice distinguishing
modusponens and modus tollens from aflirming the consequent and denying the
antecedent, and to better under— stand why the last two are fallacies.
David R. Morrow, Anthony Weston, 2011
4 NEWS ITEMS WHICH INCLUDE THE TERM «DENYING THE ANTECEDENT»
Find out what the national and international press are talking about and how the term
denying the antecedent is used in the context of the following news items.
Avoiding Fallacies in Baseball Analysis
Two different fallacies occur when you assume an isolated cause-effect relationship, denying the antecedent and affirming the consequent. «Beyond the Box Score, Jan 15»
Chinese physicists measure speed of Einstein's 'spooky action at a …
Denying the antecedent is a logical fallacy. Here is an example of an implicit denial of the antecedent: “And techzombie, if you don't believe ... «ExtremeTech, Mar 13»
Morning Must Reads: Attack
Denying the antecedent -- If A implies B, and not-A, therefore not-B. False dilemma -- Portraying two options as the only possibilities, with no ... «TIME, Sep 12»
The Problems of Functional Definitions for Personhood
In view of this distinction between sufficient and necessary conditions, "if not A, then not B" is a logical fallacy (called denying the antecedent). «ProLife Blogs, Sep 08»
