CONJUGATION OF THE VERB TO RE-PROOF
PRESENT
Present
I re-proof
you re-proof
he/she/it re-proofs
we re-proof
you re-proof
they re-proof
Present continuous
I am re-proofing
you are re-proofing
he/she/it is re-proofing
we are re-proofing
you are re-proofing
they are re-proofing
Present perfect
I have re-proofed
you have re-proofed
he/she/it has re-proofed
we have re-proofed
you have re-proofed
they have re-proofed
Present perfect continuous
I have been re-proofing
you have been re-proofing
he/she/it has been re-proofing
we have been re-proofing
you have been re-proofing
they have been re-proofing
Present tense is used to refer to circumstances that exist at the present time or over a period that includes the present time. The
present perfect refers to past events, although it can be considered to denote primarily the resulting present situation rather than the events themselves.
PAST
Past
I re-proofed
you re-proofed
he/she/it re-proofed
we re-proofed
you re-proofed
they re-proofed
Past continuous
I was re-proofing
you were re-proofing
he/she/it was re-proofing
we were re-proofing
you were re-proofing
they were re-proofing
Past perfect
I had re-proofed
you had re-proofed
he/she/it had re-proofed
we had re-proofed
you had re-proofed
they had re-proofed
Past perfect continuous
I had been re-proofing
you had been re-proofing
he/she/it had been re-proofing
we had been re-proofing
you had been re-proofing
they had been re-proofing
Past tense forms express circumstances existing at some time in the past,
FUTURE
Future
I will re-proof
you will re-proof
he/she/it will re-proof
we will re-proof
you will re-proof
they will re-proof
Future continuous
I will be re-proofing
you will be re-proofing
he/she/it will be re-proofing
we will be re-proofing
you will be re-proofing
they will be re-proofing
Future perfect
I will have re-proofed
you will have re-proofed
he/she/it will have re-proofed
we will have re-proofed
you will have re-proofed
they will have re-proofed
Future perfect continuous
I will have been re-proofing
you will have been re-proofing
he/she/it will have been re-proofing
we will have been re-proofing
you will have been re-proofing
they will have been re-proofing
The
future is used to express circumstances that will occur at a later time.
CONDITIONAL
Conditional
I would re-proof
you would re-proof
he/she/it would re-proof
we would re-proof
you would re-proof
they would re-proof
Conditional continuous
I would be re-proofing
you would be re-proofing
he/she/it would be re-proofing
we would be re-proofing
you would be re-proofing
they would be re-proofing
Conditional perfect
I would have re-proof
you would have re-proof
he/she/it would have re-proof
we would have re-proof
you would have re-proof
they would have re-proof
Conditional perfect continuous
I would have been re-proofing
you would have been re-proofing
he/she/it would have been re-proofing
we would have been re-proofing
you would have been re-proofing
they would have been re-proofing
Conditional or "future-in-the-past" tense refers to hypothetical or possible actions.
IMPERATIVE
Imperative
you re-proof
we let´s re-proof
you re-proof
The
imperative is used to form commands or requests.
NONFINITE VERB FORMS
Past participle
re-proofed
Present Participle
re-proofing
Infinitive shows the action beyond temporal perspective. The
present participle or gerund shows the action during the session. The
past participle shows the action after completion.
10 ENGLISH BOOKS RELATING TO «RE-PROOF»
Discover the use of
re-proof in the following bibliographical selection. Books relating to
re-proof and brief extracts from same to provide context of its use in English literature.
1
Firearms, the Law, and Forensic Ballistics, Second Edition
... (6) Proof of long-barrelled rifled arms; (7) Re-proof of long-barrelled rifled arms;
(8) Black powder re-proof of finished arms; (9) Nitro re-proof; (10) Superior nitro
re-proof; (11) Proof of short-barrelled arms; (12) Reproof of short-barrelled arms;
...
2
Programming Language Implementation and Logic Programming: ...
... and the use of LISP syntax for lists or pairs, which is more legible than nested
pair and null expressions. We have abbreviated append into app), we obtain the
following session (abbreviating : forest into : f o, : response into :re, : proof into : pr
...
Jan Maluszynski, Martin Wirsing,
1991
3
Theory of Formal Systems
If T is r.e. then every set A representable in Q is r.e. PROOF. Suppose A is
represented by H in Q. Then A - R-. Since TQ is assumed r.e., then A is r.e. by P,.
THEOREM 13. If T is r.e. and if every r.e. set is representable in Q, then Q is
normal.
Raymond M. Smullyan,
1961
4
Reports of Cases Adjudicated in the Several Courts of the ...
... by assignees ; further order; assignees permitted to bid 30 Woonnoorn, re,
proof; partnership; contribution .. .. .. .. 14 Woons & Tnomes, re, CHEATHAM,
proof of debt; partnership; practice H H 64 V , re, certificate ;_ assignees may
oppose ...
Great Britain. Court of Bankruptcy, John William Martin Fonblanque,
1851
5
Set Theory: Centre de Recerca Matemàtica Barcelona, 2003-2004
//RVM(re) then the tree property holds for re. Proof. Suppose RVM(re), and let v
be a witnessing probability. Suppose T is a rc- tree. Without loss, T = (re, <t). As
usual, we will identify T and its levels 7a, a < re, with the underlying subsets of re.
Joan Bagaria, Stevo Todorcevic,
2006
6
Structural understanding in advanced mathematical thinking
By Theorem 2, rre G A2, and by Theorem 3, r{m) = m. Thus r{r{n)) = r(re). QED.
Theorem 4. For any re, k G Z, r(re + 99k) = r(re). Proof. We have r(re + 99/c) = re +
99k - 99 99 Using (P3), the right-hand side can be rearranged as re + 99k — 99
re ...
It is also re-proof; it proves itself over and over again. For every promise God
gives us more than one verse; in other words, He has re-proof. He proves Himself
over and over again through His Word. Do you remember Romans 10:17?
Then sat^(P) < re. proof (a) ? Otherwise, there is an up-antichain ((pg, 9{)}j<k hi P
x Q. Let T C re be a set of size sat^(Q) such that : ^ G r} is upwards-linked. Then (^
)jer must be an up-antichain in Q; but this is impossible. X (b) By 516P, (re, re, ...
9
Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids in Differential Geometry
Although 7.20 resembles 4.7, the method of 4.7 cannot be used in a general fibre
bundle (such as a Grassmannian) and we are obliged to give a different proof.
Lemma 7.21. E admits a connection V such that V(rE')£ rE' . Proof: Let < , > be a ...
10
Grammars with Context Conditions and Their Applications
Observe that L(G), rev(L(Q)), rev(L'), rev(rev(L)), and L coincide. As L(G) G SCAT[
2/4.], this lemma holds. U Theorem 53. SCAT[2/4.] I RE. Proof. Clearly, SCAT[2/4.]
Q RE. By Lemma 32, RE Q SCAT[2/4.]. Thus, SCAT[2/4.) : RE. I Lemma 33.
Alexander Meduna, Martin Švec,
2005
NEWS ITEMS WHICH INCLUDE THE TERM «RE-PROOF»
Find out what the national and international press are talking about and how the term
re-proof is used in the context of the following news items.
Otter Wax, for reproofing your waxed cotton
This relic, from a time when motorcycling gear was little more than thick cloth and a prayer, is beautiful, but once every year or so I have to re-proof it. Finding a ... «Boing Boing, Jun 15»