«ANUCLEÁR»に関連するルーマニア語の本
以下の図書目録から
anucleárの使いかたを見つけましょう。
anucleárに関する本とルーマニア語文献で使われた文脈を提供するための簡単な抜粋文。
1
The Military-industrial Complex in American Politics, ... - Pagina 298
Kissenger, Henry A. Nucle ar We apons and Fore ign Policy . New York: Harper & Row, 1957. Knorr, Klaus, and Thornton Read, eds . Limited Strategi c War . New York: Praeger, 1962. Kolodziej , Edward A. The Uncommon De f ense and ...
Charles Allred Cannon,
1974
2
Hearings on Military Posture and H.R. 5068 (H.R. 5970), ... - Pagina 387
... on title VIII which will let us compare, based on new estimates, the difference between a nucle.ar-powered ship, the costs, and so forth, involved in a nuclear-powered ship and non-nuclear-powered ship with weapons systems, and so forth, ...
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services,
1977
3
Lok Sabha Debates - Pagina 147
Because of the absence of any fissile material in natural thorium, large scale utilisation of thorium for nuclear power generation can be ensured only by converting it through a nucle'ar power reactor into the fissile material Ujsa (b) When ...
India. Parliament. House of the People, India. Parliament. Lok Sabha,
1974
4
Nuclear Energy Cooperation with China: Hearing Before the ...
A company such as Stone & Webster could participate in a nucle ar power program in China in a variety of ways. We could provide architect/engineer services to an American equipment vendor or consortium that has contracted with China for ...
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Special Subcommittee on U.S. Trade with China,
1984
5
Documents on Germany, 1944-1985 - Pagina 887
What a strange line of reasoning that is. If it is true that the Federal Republic does not want to embark upon the independent possession of nuclear weapons, why, then, does it reject the proposal for a nucle- ar-freeze zone in Central Europe?
United States. Dept. of State. Office of the Historian,
1985
6
Department of Defense Appropriations for ... - Părţile 6-7 - Pagina 304
... should significantly reduce the "safe escape time" (i.e., the time required after launch of the first Soviet SLBM against the U.S., for the first B-52 or KC-135 to take off from any one runway and fly beyond the lethal radius of a nucle.ar burst) .
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations,
1972